.
![]() |
|
|
|
. |
|
Reprinted from the EIC/EMCW report of the proceedings. |
|
| Abstract: The object of
this paper is to aid in the selection of specifications for wire being used as transformer
bobbin pins. Key words: bobbin pin wire, bobbin pin, pin lead, terminal pin. I. INTRODUCTION In recent years, a growing demand using transformer bobbins with pins as leads, has combined with the growth of the worldwide industry. As such, many manufacturers are purchasing, producing, and supplying product to many and various end user, industry, and military specifications. This paper will address various base metal and plating considerations for wire used as bobbin pin leads. II. DISCUSSION All wires produced today are produced to specifications. Wire is measured and compared to selected production specifications to see if it was produced correctly, so it can perform properly in the application. Specifications must be selected properly and be capable of determining if the wire is functionally appropriate in order for the applications to perform as required. A. Base Metal Alloys Most bobbin pin materials come from the list of alloys and specifications below:
These alloys have been selected for various reasons: chemistry, thermal conductivity, strength, formability, coefficient of expansion and availability. (See Table 1.) Alloys are created typically for solid solution strength at solution phase optimums. Increased copper per centages provide increased conductivity; increased nickel provides strength, lower expansion rates and elevated temperature service. B. Tempers Although the tensile limits in these alloys reflect the Ultimate Tensile Strength capable of being achieved the extra hard and spring tempers are mostly used when producing straight pins. Otherwise, pins which have to be formed, or upset with retention features, or coined or swaged into tandem pin (end-to-end) configurations are specified from the much softer and more formable 1/2 Hard, 3/4 Hard or Hard tempers. (See Table 2.) Serious consideration should be given to the trade-off of formability and strength. C. Cross-sections Present designs are utilizing wire for pins with round, square and rectangular cross-sections. Mechanical property specifications for square wire are for the most part, the same as that for round wire. Rectangular wire (or flat wire) will be considered mto have round/square mechanical properties when sizes have width-to-thickness ratios is 3:1 or less. Wires which have ratios which are greater than 3:1 will use industry specifications more typical for strip and/or stamped terminals. Table 1.
Significant in the specifying of square and rectangular wire is that of the wires diagonal or corner radii. Specifying dimensions, along with total tolerance, (square, diagonal or corner radius) aids in refining control over pin size and its retention characteristics. The formulae are below: When D = Diagonal
D = 1.4142 S - .8284 radius In the case of diagonals and corner radii, only one criteria should be specified, not both. The more significant to pin retention is the diagonal. Also significant is alloy's coefficient of expansion. Nickel containing alloys are more stable during brief excursions to elevated temperatures. Pin alloys should be selected on the basis of the understanding pin and plastic expansion rates. D. Electroplating and Coating Gold, nickel, copper, tin and tin-lead electroplated finishes are the most common pin wire finishes. Electroplating allows the greatest control over thickness and uniformity. Hot dipped coatings of tin and tin-lead are more difficult to control in this respect. Most hot dipped square and round pin wires have nominal coats of 25 micron, which although bright and attractive, is insufficient in thickness to maintain any required long term solderability shelf-life. Some round lead wires have been produced with heavier dipped finishes. 1. Overplating In recent years, platers of tin and tin-lead finishes have been yielding to increase pressures to reduce lead content in the finishes, plant environment and plating waste affluent. More "environmentally friendly" percentages of 90/10, 93/7 and 95/5 tin/lead have replaced the more traditional 60/40 tin-lead and 100 per cent tin plating.All of the tin and tin lead platings can be applied in various controlled thickness ranges. Thickness specifications typically indicate a 3-5 micron minimum and are specified both with and without additional underplatings of nickel and copper. The actual thickness of the overplate is significant to the lngevity of solderability. Tin and tin-lead finishes are produced in bright, satin and matte finishes. However, specifying the plating finish is a severely limiting detail in so far as this sonsideration may limit suppliers and supplier processing options. 2. Underplating The two most common underplating are nickel and copper. Specifications which include underplatings are developed for many reasons; base metal isolation, convenience to the electroplater, and short and long term solderability concerns. Copper as an underplate is chosen typically
if nickel cannot be used. When it is used as a "flash" to 1 micron it is mainly
employed as a vehicle to prepare the base wire (copper alloys) to be overplated.
When present in 2.5 microns or greater copper will operate as a diffusionary barrier
allowing migratory base metal constituents to be absorbed in the highly soluable copper
layer. Thus in this manner the migratory constituents do not reach the susceptible tin and
tin-lead layer and cause problems in the overplate ability
to wet. Table 2 Tensile ranges for Round and
Square Wire
Nickel as an underplate is chosen
because of the more desirable properties it has. As a "flash" it is
used mainly to prepare base wire (copper or nickel alloys) for over plating. When nickel
is plate .75 micron or more, nickel will sewrve as a significant barrier preventing base
metal constituents from migrating through to effect the overplating. Nickel can be
electroplated several microns in thickness without problems from
stress cracking. E. Solderability concerns Solderability is the joining process which establishes a metallurgical bond between the wire pin, the filler solder and the wrapping wire. Solderability of metallic surfaces are judged by the degree of "wetting" during the soldering operation against selected standards. The solderability shelf-life should be guaranteed for 1 year from the date of the manufacture. Solderability is specified and interpreted in many ways: personal interpretation, company standard, industry standards, government standards, and military standards. Most pin wire is produced to a solderability standard, (ie. Company Standard,Mil-Std 202). Standards should be used to inspect incoming wire. The solderability of the wire will ever so slowly degrade as time passes from the date of manufacture. Manufacturing companies shipping finished components need to pay attention to the time-effect on on inventory and the clause of the standard that pertains to "passed-on" assurances of tested shelf life. Just because an assembly is produced with wire made originally to military stanbdards does not guarantee that the assembly is guaranteed to meet the same military standard months later., It must be retested. Finished transformer coils may contain bobbins months old. These bobbins may be made from wire inventroy which was months old. Wire originally produced with solderability to Mil-Std 202, Method 208. may not be solderable to the same standard months later due to the fact that the standard contains tests which simulate shelf life aging. Steam aging and heat aging are examples of thesetypes of tests. They may have spent some time as wire inventory, bobbin inventory, or as finished coils. Pin solderability to this level would again have to be reevaluated and recertified. Of course the original wire must meet the tests originally. F. Surface Treatments Pin retention forces recently can be increased through serrating, or knurling preplated wire surfaces prior to being inserted into the bobbin. Knurling is possible on round wire as well as square and rectangular wire. Knurling round wire will cause some increased ovality and square wire some of the dimension tolerance. Tooling typically containing from 33 to 80 TPI (teeth per inch) in a straight pattern appears to be most effective although there are many variations possible. In lieu of knurling the surface of the pin material, pin retention may be enhanced by coining or upsetting with securing star, flat or barbed feature. Some of this may be performed in tandem with insertion operations or performed separately.CONCLUSION The preceding is a quick overview of alloys,
cross-sections, underplating and overplating specifications. Consideration to
specifying pin alloys, tolerances, electroplating finishes and surfaces will greatly aid
in achieving maximum retention forces and good solderability. REFERENCES 1) William K. Halleran, "An Overview of the Solderability Considerations of Wire", Proceedings of the International Coil Winding Association, November 13-15, 1984. 2) William K. Halleran, "The Bobbin Pin Connector: Square Wire and Solderability Considerations", Proceedings of the International Coil Winding Association, September 30- October 3, 1985. 3) Standards Handbook, Part 2-Alloy Data, Wrought Copper and Copper Alloy Mill Products, Eighth Edition, 1985, Copper Development Association, Greenwich CT. 4) Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Nonferrous Metal Products, Copper and Copper Alloys, (1994) BIOGRAPHY Jim McGowan graduated from Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA., Bachelors of Science. He has worked 11 years as a Sales Engineer in aluminum master alloys, tantalum, columblum and high strength nickel and nickel cobalt alloys and as a product specialist in beryllium copper for Kawecki Berylco Industries, Cabot Corporation and NKG Metals Corporation. He has been employed for the last 10years at R&F Alloy Wires, Inc., Fairfield, NJ where he is vice president of sales and marketing.
|
Specifications & Data Packaging Technical Publications International Sales Facilities Plating Home
125 New Dutch Lane, P.O. Box 10003, Fairfield,
NJ 07004, U.S.A.
voice: 973. 227. 6222 fax: 973. 808.
8209 e-mail: info@rfalloy.com
© copyright 1999, R&F
ALLOY WIRES, INC., all rights reserved